Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's overall score of 77. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is a lot older than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a slightly better display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a much longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.