Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Meteor grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a score of 80.3 against 77. Even though Nokia 8 V 5G UW is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, we must note that it is also a way older, thicker and way heavier phone. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a little bit better display density. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a bit superior battery lifetime than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.