Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting an 86.6 score against 77. Even though the Galaxy A50s is incredibly older than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's construction is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite higher pixels density and a little larger display. Galaxy A50s features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A50s features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a back facing camera with more mega pixels, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.