Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a score of 85.5 against 77. The Galaxy A51 is a a little bit heavier phone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but both are equally thin. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version.
Galaxy A51 counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51. They have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, a screen with the same size and the same display pixels density.
The Galaxy A51 has much more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations, a camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.