Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting a global score of 90.8 against 77. The Galaxy A51 5G construction is noticeably older, just a bit heavier and a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have the same pixel density, a display of the same size and the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Galaxy A51 5G has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a camera with more MP, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.