Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a general score of 91.1 against 77. Galaxy A52s is an a lot older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52s has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s. Both of them have the same display pixel density, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a same size display. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A52s captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A52s has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.