Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having an 87.5 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A71 design is just a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but it is just a bit heavier and was released many years before. Both devices we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per inch in the display. Galaxy A71 counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A71 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A71, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.