Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's overall score of 77. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is notably older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.