Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a general score of 97.6 against 77. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version. Even though the Galaxy Fold is much older and much heavier than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's body is still thinner.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.