Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a 98.9 score against 77. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an extremely older, just a bit thicker and heavier phone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. These phones work with the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide the user identical operating system features.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit less pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.