Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting a global score of 81.2 against 77. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Note 3 body is a bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it's just a little bit thicker and was released 10 years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less cpu cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher pixel count in each display inch.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a slightly better memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a bigger camera aperture, a back facing camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.