Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting a overall score of 79.3 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a way older and just a bit heavier device than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit thinner anyway. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
Galaxy Note 5 features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back camera with way more MP and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.