Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 general score. Although it's the best device in this review, we must note that it's also a notably older, a little bit heavier and a bit thicker device. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a back-facing camera with lesser MP resolution, a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures in low-light environments and a way smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.