Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a overall score of 94.8 against 77. Galaxy S20 is a a little bit lighter phone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but both of them are equally thin. These phones use the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. Galaxy S20 has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures, higher video frame rate and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features longer battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.