Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a score of 98 against 77. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is extremely older, somewhat thicker and notably heavier than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. These phones come with the same Android 13 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite lower pixel density, a bit smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting way worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way higher resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery performance that is very similar to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.