Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a 93.4 score against 77. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 13 operating system. Even though the Galaxy S22 is older than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's body is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more brightness and a quite higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S22 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a way better video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo and Samsung Galaxy S22 both count with incredibly similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has greater battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.