Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's overall score of 77. Both of these phones come with the same Android 13 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, we must highlight that it is also an older, thicker and much heavier phone.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has more display brightness, a little bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a just a little greater pixel quantity per inch of screen. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better video resolution, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality. The Galaxy S22 Ultra and Motorola Edge 40 Neo have extremely similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a battery life that is very similar to Motorola Edge 40 Neo's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.