Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 overall score. Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, we must note that it is also older, much thicker and much heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has improved battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way better (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.