Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting an 88.5 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but it is just a bit heavier and was released 4 years before. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller display. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.