Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 general score. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a noticeably older and just a little heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but Samsung made it a bit thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit smaller screen and a just a little worse screen density.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.