Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is way better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it's much heavier and was released many years before. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels quantity in each inch of display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Neo takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.