Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's general score of 83.4. Even though Apple iPhone XS is way older than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner. Apple iPhone XS has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has lesser processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and much darker screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel amount in each inch of screen and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than iPhone XS, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 73% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.