Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel, but it is much heavier. Google Pixel counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 less CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a way larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has a way higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has much more storage for apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 66 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.