Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 global score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a way newer device than Google Pixel 2 XL, but it's heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little larger screen. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much better video quality, a lot bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.