Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, with a global score of 83.4 against 80. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is a lot newer than the Google Pixel 3's, although it's heavier and just a bit thicker. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 58% greater battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs, a much higher video definition and a back facing camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.