Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, with an 83.4 score against 78.8. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's body is incredibly newer than the Google Pixel 3a's, although it's just a little bit thicker and notably heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Google Pixel 3a features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 53 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.