Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with a score of 83.4 against 78.9. These phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, so it gives you lots of additional features. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is way newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it's a little thicker and heavier.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.