Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 overall score. Even though the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is notably newer than the Google Pixel 4 XL, it's just a little thicker and just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL and Motorola Edge 40 Pro count with very similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a better pixels density. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.