Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a's overall score of 82.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is newer, but notably heavier and a bit thicker than Google Pixel 4a.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a larger display. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Google Pixel 4a has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a much better video definition and a back camera with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.