Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with an 87.5 score against 83.4. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4a 5G is extremely older than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's body is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a much more MP back camera, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and a much higher video definition.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.