Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's global score of 83.4. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 5 is noticeably older than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's body is just a little bit thinner and a lot lighter. The Google Pixel 5 features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little bit better display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures, a much higher video definition and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.