Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 general score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner phone than HTC One M9, but it's way heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it offers a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher pixel number in each screen inch. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
HTC One M9 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and an additional graphics co-processor. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a lot more mega-pixels back camera, a way higher video quality and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.