Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is much newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the HTC U Ultra. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 less processing cores (although faster). HTC U Ultra counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a really longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a lot better video definition and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.