Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than HTC U11, getting an 83.4 score against 77.6. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is extremely newer than HTC U11's, although it's just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC U11 features a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better display than HTC U11, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a much lower pixels amount per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a very superior camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera, a way higher video definition and a much larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.