Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit, getting an 83.4 score against 77. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro design is extremely newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it's just a little bit thicker and notably heavier.
LG G7 Fit has a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less brightness and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
LG G7 Fit features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a very superior camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video, a lot bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.