Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is slightly better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 overall score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's body is way newer, but somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than the LG G7 ThinQ. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G7 ThinQ has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG G7 ThinQ has a better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and less brightness, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a greater camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition, a lot more megapixels back camera and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.