Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, with an 83.4 score against 82.7. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the newer 13 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is newer than LG G8X ThinQ's, although it's just a bit heavier and a bit thicker.
LG G8X ThinQ has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit better display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a greater camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more MP back camera.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 15% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.