Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 global score. LG K92 is a incredibly older and just a little bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but LG was able to build it a little thinner anyway. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
LG K92 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little more vivid screen than LG K92. Both of them have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a display of the same size and the same pixel density.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit better camera than LG K92, because although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a way higher video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
LG K92 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.