Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's score of 82.5. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a a lot newer phone than LG V30S ThinQ, but it is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a way lower amount of pixels per display inch and a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a greater camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot more MP back camera, a lot better video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.