Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 83.4 against 81.3. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a way newer cellphone than LG V35 ThinQ, although it's noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro and LG V35 ThinQ count with incredibly similar displays, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera, a much higher video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.