Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, so it gives some nice extra features and optimized performance. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is way newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker.
LG V40 ThinQ features a screen that's very similar to the screen in Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although the LG V40 ThinQ has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a greater pixel density. LG V40 ThinQ features more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a way better video definition.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.