Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with a score of 87.6 against 83.4. The LG V60 ThinQ is a better phone than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, we must highlight that it's also extremely older, just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, a just a little worse pixel density and a bit smaller display.
The LG V60 ThinQ has much more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution and a worse 7680x4320 video quality, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.