Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 overall score. LG Velvet is an way older device than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but LG was able to make it just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The LG Velvet features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.