Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's general score of 83.4. Although LG Wing is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, we must highlight that it's also noticeably older, way heavier and extremely thicker. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the LG Wing has 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13.
LG Wing features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than LG Wing, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, a quite smaller screen and a quite worse screen pixel density.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than LG Wing, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 50 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a way better video resolution and a larger back camera sensor.
The LG Wing has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory, the LG Wing also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than LG Wing, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.