Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with an 85.3 score against 83.4. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is an older and heavier device than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but Microsoft managed to build it way thinner anyway.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a display that is just as good as the Motorola Edge 40 Pro one, because although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has much lower brightness, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density, a bigger screen and a higher 1892 x 2688 resolution. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a camera in the back with a way better 50 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 3% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.