Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-04-04 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it is thicker and heavier.
The Moto Z Force features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and 8 GB lesser RAM memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a way worse display pixels density and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.