Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-04-04 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is a bit better than Moto Z2 Play's general score of 77.4. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is a lot newer than Moto Z2 Play's, although it is way thicker and notably heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Moto Z2 Play features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 53% more battery size. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking images and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.