Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 global score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola One Hyper. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the newer 13 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display. The Motorola One Hyper features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a back camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos. Motorola One Hyper counts with more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.