Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's general score of 83.1. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Pro. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has much lower brightness, and they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a better 1440 x 3168px resolution and a better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a back-facing camera with more megapixels.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.