Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.4 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2023-04-04 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A13 5G's score of 82.1. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy A13 5G's, but it is also just a little bit heavier. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12, counting with some extra features.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a bit bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a better pixels density. Galaxy A13 5G features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A13 5G features just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 9% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.